Story

Edith und Max Michaelis

On the first page of the file kept by the Vermögensverwertungsstelle (Asset Realisation Office) on the lawyer Max Michaelis and his wife Edith, there is a pencil note reading “bevorzugt” (preferred). What did the officials of the Asset Realisation Office treat as “bevorzugt“ from the property of the couple – and why?

Edith und Max Michaelis

Born:
Edith Michaelis: 9 August 1883 in Berlin, Max Michaelis: 8 October 1885 in Berlin
Died:
Deported to Minsk/Maly Trostinec; declared dead on 15 January 1948, official date of death 1 January 1944
Last place of residence:
Kurfürstendamm 185, Berlin
Black‑and‑white photograph of a street. The section shows a row of houses on the right, cars from the 1930s on the left, and several pedestrians.
Kurfürstendamm with street traffic, c. 1930/1938. German Federal Archives, B 145 Bild‑P020119, photographer: A. Frankl
Black‑and‑white photograph of an elegant four‑storey residential building. It is a corner building with shops on the ground floor.
Residential building Kurfürstendamm 185, 1964. Landesarchiv Berlin F Rep. 290 (01) no. 0263475

The couple Max and Edith Michaelis

The couple Max and Edith Michaelis lived in a house built in 1902–1903 by the architect Wilhelm Lopsch at Kurfürstendamm 185 – an upscale residential area in western Berlin. From April 1934 onwards, they lived there on the first floor of the front building, the Beletage, in seven rooms. For Edith Michaelis née Neustadt, this was her second marriage. She had married the merchant Louis Ludwig Lewin in 1908, who then died at an unknown date. Max and Edith Michaelis married in August 1927. Before moving into the apartment at Kurfürstendamm 185, Max Michaelis had lived at Pariser Straße 30–31 and Edith Michaelis at Steinacher Straße 1 in Berlin‑Schöneberg.

The owners and landlords of the house at Kurfürstendamm 185 were the Berglas family until 1941. As the family was persecuted as Jewish, the Geheime Staatspolizei (Secrete State Police, Gestapo) confiscated the property, and it passed into the ownership of the German Reich. In 1943, the former mining inspector Heinrich Kellermann “Arisiert” (aryanised) the property and thus also the house.

First page of the asset declaration of Max Michaelis, 20 June 1942. BLHA, Rep. 36A (II) no. 26893, fol. 2

Excerpt from a document, letterhead
Letterhead of Max Michaelis. BLHA, Rep. 36A (II) No. 142, fol. 64
Excerpt from a pre-printed form: Signature
Signature of Edith Michaelis on the declaration of assets dated 22 June 1942. Edith Michaelis was required to sign using the imposed name ‘Sara’. BLHA, Rep. 36A (II) No. 26893, p. 17v.

“Jüdischer Konsulent” (Jewish consultant)

Max Michaelis was admitted as a lawyer at the Berlin Court of Appeal and also worked as a notary. But from 1933 onwards, he and Edith Michaelis were persecuted by the National Socialist state as Jewish. From 1938, Max Michaelis was only permitted to work as a “Konsulent” (consultant), which was not comparable to his previous professional practice: Jewish lawyers had their licences revoked and were only allowed to advise and represent Jewish clients. Furthermore, a substantial share of the fees had to be paid to the Reich Chamber of Lawyers. This money was administered by the specially established Ausgleichsstelle (Compensation Office).

Michaelis also represented neighbours from the house at Kurfürstendamm 185, including Jacob Intrator and his wife Rosa, as well as Erich and Martha Kaufmann, who were likewise persecuted as Jewish. Max Michaelis also had his office rooms in the apartment at Kurfürstendamm 185.

Briefkopf mit einem Namen, Telefonnummer und weiteren Daten

Letterhead of Max Michaelis. BLHA, Rep. 36A (II) no. 16496, fol. 62

Deported and robbed

The deportation of the couple from Berlin took place on 24 June 1942 with the sixteenth “Osttransport” (Eastern Transport) to Minsk/Maly Trostinec. The same deportation list included more than fifty employees – some in senior positions – of the Reichsvereinigung der Juden (Reich Association of Jews).

After the arrival of the deportation train, members of the Waffen‑SS and the uniformed police murdered most of the deportees in a forest near Maly Trostinec, around 12 km southeast of Minsk. Whether the couple were among them has not been clarified to this day.

Image of a landscape‑format document: tabular pre‑printed transport list. Next to consecutive numbers, the names of the deportees are typed, with details on name, date of birth, address, and occupation.

Transport list of the Secret State Police Berlin. Max and Edith Michaelis appear under the numbers 186 and 187. Arolsen Archives, transport list: sixteenth “Osttransport“ to Minsk/Maly Trostinec, 24 June 1942, DocID: 127187918

Before their deportation, Max and Edith Michaelis had to complete the sixteen‑page Vermögenserklärung (declaration of assets). The handwritten declaration is the last trace of the couple. Max Michaelis’s asset declaration is dated 20 June 1942, that of Edith Michaelis 22 June 1942. In the section on household inventory and furnishings, the couple provided no information; in Max Michaelis’s declaration, the corresponding lines are additionally marked with question marks.

Pre‑printed form, filled in and signed by hand
Last page of the Vermögenserklärung of Max Michaelis with the handwritten note “As far as I am able to do so at the moment”, 20 June 1942. BLHA, 36A (II) no. 26893, fol. 9v

With the deportation of Max Michaelis, his legal cases were transferred in July 1942 to Dr Bruno Apt. He too was authorised to practise only as a “Konsulent”.

A formal notification or order of confiscation to the couple by the National Socialist authorities was no longer required. Because the deportation was carried out abroad, the Elfte Verordnung zum Reichsbürgergesetz (Eleventh Decree to the Reich Citizenship Law) applied automatically.

Typewritten document with names and biographical data, supplemented with handwritten notes
First page of the file on Max Michaelis at the Vermögensverwertungsstelle. BLHA, Rep. 36A (II) no. 26893, fol. 1

The “bevorzugte” “Verwertung” (preferred liquidation)

Following the receipt of the Vermögenserklärungen from Max and Edith Michaelis by the Vermögensverwertungsstelle, the tax officials began their work. They opened a file on the couple in which they documented the “Vermögensverwertung” (asset liquidation). On the first page of the file – a kind of overview sheet for the officials – the handwritten note “bevorzugt” (preferred) appears next to the names and address of the persecuted couple. Does this indicate that the couple’s property to be treated as “bevorzugte”?


Insight into the background of why the apartment and furnishings of Max and Edith Michaelis were to receive special treatment is provided by a letter from the Continentale Öl Aktiengesellschaft to the Oberfinanzpräsident (Senior Finance President) dated 11 July 1942:

Typewritten document with handwritten notes
Letter from the Continentale Öl Aktiengesellschaft to the Oberfinanzpräsident, 11 July 1942. BLHA, Rep. 36A (II) no. 26893, fol. 44

The apartment in which Max and Edith Michaelis had lived was intended for use by the Continentale Öl Aktiengesellschaft. The company stated that it required the rooms to carry out a task assigned by General Field Marshal and Reich Minister of Economics Hermann Göring. Göring had ordered the Continentale Öl Aktiengesellschaft to secure, administer, and economically exploit oil deposits, extraction facilities, and oil companies in territories occupied or influenced by the German Reich, and to ensure the supply of fuel essential to the war effort. The apartment was presumably intended to serve as office space.

As early as 2 July 1942, about a week after the deportation of the couple, the Vermögensverwertungsstelle therefore began to “verwerten” the household furnishings piece by piece. The authority sold the couple’s property directly from the apartment at Kurfürstendamm 185.

Assessment by an auctioneer

For a specific part of the furnishings, an appraisal was carried out before their “Verwertung“ by Leo Spik, the owner of the Union art auction house. In two expert reports, he valued a total of sixty-five objects.

Maschinenschriftliche Auflistung von Objekten; oben links ein Briefkopf in roter Schrift

Appraisal list by Leo Spik, 1942. BLHA, Rep. 36A (II) no. 26893, fol. 30

  • Typewritten list of objects, signed; letterhead in red print at the top left
    Appraisal list by Leo Spik, 1942. BLHA, Rep. 36A (II) no. 26893, fol. 25
  • Typewritten list of objects; letterhead in red print at the top left
    Appraisal list by Leo Spik, 1942. BLHA, Rep. 36A (II) no. 26893, fol. 31
  • Typewritten list of objects, signed; letterhead in red print at the top left
    Appraisal list by Leo Spik, 1942. BLHA, Rep. 36A (II) no. 26893, fol. 32

    Buyers “Überreiter” and “Kornfeld”

    The furnishings from the apartment at Kurfürstendamm 185 were subsequently sold in several lots through private sales.

    In researching the buyers who profited from the theft of the Michaelis’s property, two stand out in particular – those who acquired the items separately appraised by Leo Spik.

    On 4 July 1942, the Vermögensverwertungsstelle sold eleven objects to a person named Gottfried Kornfeld, residing at Flensburger Straße 20, at the appraised price of 1,241 reichsmarks. These included furniture, household items, and framed prints. Two days later, the remaining fifty-four separately appraised objects were purchased by a Sophie Überreiter, residing at Pariser Straße 55, for a total of 13,231 reichsmarks. She thus acquired the largest part of the household furnishings belonging to Max and Edith Michaelis, including several artworks.

    • Pre‑printed document, landscape format, filled in by hand
      Receipt for private sale to Gottfried Kornfeld, 4 July 1942. BLHA, Rep. 36A (II) no. 26893, fol. 24
    • Pre‑printed document, landscape format, filled in by hand
      Receipt for private sale to Gottfried Kornfeld, 4 July 1942. BLHA, Rep. 36A (II) no. 26893, fol. 24v
    • Pre‑printed document, landscape format, filled in by hand
      Receipt for private sale to Sophie Überreiter, 6 July 1942. BLHA, Rep. 36A (II) no. 26893, fol. 29
    • Pre‑printed document, landscape format, filled in by hand
      Receipt for private sale to Sophie Überreiter, 6 July 1942. BLHA, Rep. 36A (II) no. 26893, fol. 29v
      Vorgedrucktes Formular, handschriftlich ausgefüllt

      Deposit slip, 8 July 1942. BLHA, Rep. 36A (II) no. 26893, fol. 35

      The further documents in the file relating to these two purchases raise questions: the deposit slips in the Vermögensverwertungsstelle how that the total amount of both private sales – 14,472 reichsmarks – was paid into the Oberfinanzkasse (Senior Prasident treasury) as a single sum, even though the purchases were made separately.

      What was the relationship between these buyers? Who was Sophie Überreiter, the buyer who purchased a large lot of furnishings including several artworks and thus profited significantly from the dispossession of Max and Edith Michaelis? And who was Gottfried Kornfeld? Answers to these questions cannot be found in the file of the Vermögensverwertungsstelle.

      Verwertung” (liquidation) of a library

      As evidenced by a delivery note, the haulage company Willy Kulka also delivered a large quantity of books from Kurfürstendamm 185 to the Vermögensverwertungsstelle on 6 July 1942. There, the expert specialising in books, Max Niederlechner, valued them at 2,200 reichsmarks and proposed a buyer: the antiquarian bookseller Gustav Schmidt in Berlin‑Halensee.

      The library of Max and Edith Michaelis contained both legal and classical literature. This is shown by a list that the expert sent to the Vermögensverwertungsstelle. It includes those works he did not classify as “minderwertig” (inferior). Gustav Schmidt purchased the books and received them on 23 July 1942.

      • Typewritten document listing book titles; stamp
        List compiled by the expert Max Niederlechner, 21 July 1942. BLHA, Rep. 36A (II) no. 26893, fol. 47
      • Typewritten document listing book titles; stamp
        List compiled by the expert Max Niederlechner, 21 July 1942. BLHA, Rep. 36A (II) no. 26893, fol. 47v
        Typewritten document, filled in by hand
        Receipt for the handover of the library to Gustav Schmidt, 23 July 1942. BLHA, Rep. 36A (II) no. 26893, fol. 49

        Verwertung” (liquidation) of household furnishings

        Other furnishings from the apartment at Kurfürstendamm 185 that were not part of Leo Spik’s separate appraisal were likewise sold through private sales.

        Furniture and everyday household items went to various individuals, including an interpreter named Rudolf F. Gross from the Referat Sprachendienst (Language Service Department) of the Auswärtiges Amt (Reich Minister of Foreign Affairs), and a Lieutenant Buck. The caretaker of the building at Kurfürstendamm 185, Fritz Schaletzke, also profited by purchasing the couple’s kitchen furnishings. What remained of the household contents was sold on 27 July 1942 to the retailer of the Wirtschaftsgruppe Einzelhandel (Retail Trade Economic Group) Karl Gentsch for 352 reichsmarks.

        Where are the objects?

        The sale of the entire household furnishings was completed in August 1942, only two months after the deportation of the couple. The “bevorzugte” “Verwertung” (preferred liquidation) by the Vermögensverwertungsstelle was therefore carried out as quickly as possible so that the Continentale Öl Aktiengesellschaft could take possession of the rooms.

        With their sale by the National Socialist authorities, the objects from the apartment at Kurfürstendamm 185 entered private ownership; their subsequent whereabouts remain unclear to this day. It cannot be ruled out that some of the artworks may have found their way into public collections by other means. Tracing them, however, is difficult, as the files contain only limited information on the works and do not include details such as the artists’ first names.

        The file of the Vermögensverwertungsstelle also offers hardly any insight into the biographies of the couple, making it nearly impossible to reconstruct a picture of their lives from it alone. Further research in the restitution and compensation files, which had been initiated by descendants, was therefore indispensable.

        Find out more about the history after 1945 in the chapter on Responsibility.