Outlook

On Restitutions and Open Endings.
“Where does it come from?”

Colour photograph of two people standing to the left and right of a large oil painting.

Siblings Antony and Nicola Easton with the Großes Stilleben by Ludwig Adam Kunz, 2024. Source: private

Just and fair solutions…

… with the owners or their heirs is a core principle of the Washington Principles of 1998. They remain the guiding framework for dealing with Nazi‑looted property in those states that signed them – including Germany.

These “just and fair solutions” also include the return of stolen objects to their rightful owners, so‑called restitution. Provenance research in the OFP project supports this goal through its work with the files of the Vermögensverwertungsstelle (Asset Realisation Office). In doing so, it also makes National Socialist injustice evident.

If the files reveal that stolen objects such as paintings or books were acquired by a public institution, provenance researchers inform that institution. It is then the responsibility of museums and other cultural institutions to identify the heirs of the persecuted individuals and to examine the possibility of restitution.

Through their research in the files of the Vermögensverwertungsstelle, the researchers thus provide collection‑holding institutions with a basis for working together with heirs to find “just and fair solutions”. How this might look in individual cases is shown by two procedures initiated by the OFP project:

It’s [the stillife by Kunz is] a living entity that survived the destruction of my family and I will hang it on my walls with considerable pride to serve in their memory.

Antony Easton, filmmaker and artist, descendant of Paul Jakob Eisner, 9 April 2024
A photograph of an oil painting. The dark painting depicts a still life featuring fruit and various animals.
Ludwig Adam Kunz’s Großes Stilleben (Large Still Life) after restoration, 2025. Source: private

After the Commission for Looted Art in Europe had helped identify heirs, the Israel Museum in Jerusalem restituted Ludwig Adam Kunz’s Großes Stilleben (Large Still Life) to the descendants in 2024.

The Berlinische Galerie has come to a "just and fair solution" with the descendants of Fritz Kurt Lomnitz.

The artwork will remain in Berlin.

Colour photograph of an oil painting showing a man in a blue‑and‑red uniform against a sandy‑coloured background, holding his arms as if in an embrace.
Anton von Werner, Französischer Infanterist, oil on cardboard, 1882 – during the preparation of this exhibition for the OFP project still: Berlinische Galerie, Museum of Modern Art, BG‑M‑SG 6549/92

Open ends and absences

Sometimes the search for cultural property whose theft is documented in the files of the Vermögensverwertungsstelle leads to a museum or another public institution.

Very often, however, the trail of the objects is lost after their last mention in valuation lists and auction records. Most cultural property stolen from persecuted individuals ended up in private ownership or the art trade and remains missing to this day.

The situation is further complicated by the fact that the Washington Principles do not apply to private individuals, non‑public collections, or the art trade.

Finding “just and fair solutions” in these cases depends on the initiative and willingness of individual persons or organisations.

In general, the often very imprecise descriptions of the works in the files make it impossible to identify artworks to trace – and return – them.

What remains are open ends.

This is a well‑known problem in provenance research – as the cases presented in the exhibition also show.

Pre‑printed inventory form, filled in by typewriter.
The document Inventar und Bewertung (inventory and valuation) in the case of Recha Storck, 22 October 1943. BLHA, Rep. 36A (II) no. 37426, fol. 28

What happened to the “Posten Bücher” (batch of books) and the “Blüthner‑Flügel” (Blüthner grand piano) from the property of Recha Storck which the bailiff Hoffmann recorded as part of her household inventory and which Walter Conrad, who had moved into Storck’s apartment with his family, did not purchase?

Is the painting by H. E. Pohle still in the possession of the family of SS‑Obersturmführer Johannes Schertl, who acquired it from the confiscated property of Hugo Loewy?

Vordruck im Querformat, handschriftlich ausgefüllt
Verkaufsbeleg zwischen Schertl und der Vermögensverwertungsstelle, 28. Dezember 1942. BLHA, Rep. 36A (II) Nr. 24446, Bl. 30

Beyond the gaps in object biographies, provenance research based on the files of the Vermögensverwertungsstelle also reveals other absences. Valuable art and cultural objects that the experts documented in greater detail – or even classified as museum objects – generally came from well‑to‑do households. Despite antisemitic tax and economic policies, their owners had managed to keep these items until then.

Thus, this field of research primarily deals with the biographies of persecuted individuals from more affluent social groups. The perspective on those who possessed little (or nothing) at the time of the asset seizure is missing. Yet even here, there was often a final book, table, or shirt that was “verwertet” (liquidated). Reconstructing the path of these object, however is almost impossible due to the scarcity of information.

These absences prompt critical reflection on memory, ownership, and the collective responsibility borne by the descendants of perpetrators and beneficiaries of National Socialist injustice.

Where does it come from?

Taking responsibility for the past through provenance research of your own

What we own often has a past. Sometimes we know it; sometimes it remains hidden. This guided exploration invites you to explore the first steps you can take when researching the history of your latest flea‑market find or a family heirloom.

The exploration begins with a simple question: Where does it come from?